The screenshot shows us both the single-core and multi-core score, compared to the Ryzen 7 3700X, but another. And so it looks like the probable reason for the loss of performance when going multi-core on the intel part is the higher latency between cores due to the process node being bigger. A screenshot of a CPU-Z benchmark score of an alleged AMD Ryzen 9 5900X has surfaced.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the cache levels, the. average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results. I couldn't find core-to-core latency for the 5800x, but the 5950 showed latencies on the order of 18ns for certain blocks of cores. Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. They reported core-to-core latency on the order of 28-30ns for the 11700 vs 19-24ns for their 10700k part. IIRC from Anandtech's review, they were speculating it was because the larger physical die size of Intel's 14nm part caused intra-core communication to be slower compared to AMD's 7nm parts. I am thinking the 5800X is tuned for all cores (or stock at say 4.45GHz) and not a single maximum thread clock (which might go to ~4.85Ghz according to THW 5800X review).Īdmin said:We don't know why the 5800X makes up all its performance losses from the single-threaded test in the multi-threaded test, but it could be due to reduced turbo frequencies on the Core i9 part, as well as architectural differences between the two chips. The i9-11900K score looks legit though (4.7GHz all core boost). Like saying I can boot into W10 at 5.9GHz and start CPU-Z and I can boot into W10 and run a single thread bench at 5.3GHz in CPU-Z (getting a 714 in multicore strongly suggests a single thread is all that CPU-Z could see). GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on Amazon, Google Top 15 Highest frequencies for AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with Radeon Vega Graphics - CPU-Z VALIDATOR NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660.
Like no AMD 5000 series CPU's in the overall ranking chart, the highest I see is a 3950X.Īlso it looks like single core maximum OC as there is no multicore score for the i7-11700K (at 5.3GHz) and no single or multicore scores for the i9-11900K at 5.9GHz. This is further fuel to the fire on AMD's current technology and performance leadership. CPU-Z scores for the Intel Core i9-10900K (10 cores, 20 threads) are set at 5 points respectively. The comparison chart is basically overclocked RL numbers vs others cpu's at stock.Several things are odd at my end. The Ryzen 9 5950X is rated as scoring 690.2 points in the same single-threaded benchmark and 13306.5 points in the multi-threaded one. If you just read the link here and don't look at whats on twitter it just looks like stock numbers. However there is no mention in the article that the numbers are from an overclocked system. While this one posted today are all overclocked numbers. Makaveli said:Yes the Chart above minus the 11900k at 5.2 look to all be stock numbers.